Earle Arney's call for "bold ideas to tackle planning" appears in Building Magazine

  • 06 November 2019
    Earle Arney and Sheila Botting of Deloitte, give keynote speech at WorkTech 19 Toronto
    Read more /
  • 06 November 2019
    Earle Arney’s call for “bold ideas to tackle planning” appears in Building Magazine
    Read more /
  • 25 July 2019
    The Mayor approves our major 844-home Barnet regeneration
    Read more /
  • 20 June 2019
    Arney Fender Katsalidis wins AJ100 Award
    Read more /
  • 03 June 2019
    Arney Fender Katsalidis appoints residential expert Jonathan Clarke as Director
    Read more /
  • 24 May 2019
    Associate Peter Vrahimis makes Mix Magazine’s annual list of rising stars in Architecture and Design
    Read more /
  • 16 October 2018
    Martin Sparrow appointed to the CTBUH Height and Data Committee
    Read more /
  • 02 October 2018
    Planning Approval for new International Quarter London office building
    Read more /
  • 25 July 2018
    Matthew Kobylar shares his insights on the future of London’s commercial office space
    Read more /
  • 11 July 2018
    Can Build to Rent Solve the Housing Crisis? Vision 2018
    Read more /

06 November 2019

Earle Arney’s call for “bold ideas to tackle planning” appears in Building Magazine

By AFK

An opinion piece written by our Founding Director and CEO Earle Arney'shas appeared in the latest issue of leading industry title Building, calling for a radical shake-up and crative rethinking of planning, in order to deliver more housing and help solve the housing crisis. 

The full transcript of the piece is below and can be read here


Only bold ideas will tackle planning - what we really need is reform and creativity

 

Esther McVey’s recent announcement on planning fee refunds, ahead of the release of the government’s more detailed proposals to be published later this year to “make planning smoother, faster, more effective”, shows they are at least looking seriously at the planning process. The current system has long been a handbrake to solving the housing supply crisis. But if this is just the start of another two decades of tinkering with existing legislation, it will not get more homes built. What we really need is reform and creativity.

The measures McVey outlined included council planning departments to be held “to account” for why building work is not happening sooner, offering developers a refund on planning fees. While on the face of it, this seems like a robust incentive for planning departments to work faster, it fails to realise that councils aren’t simply “difficult to work with” but that there are inherent flaws in the planning system. Not least, planning departments are often under resourced and poorly funded. Critically, it seems that the government may not understand that planning is utterly at the behest of local politics.

While reform and better funding could feasibly tackle some concerns, one bold course of action would be for the government to propose the formation of independent development authorities (IDA), empowered with the tools and powers to deliver good quality homes to housing targets on brownfield land across the UK. This could be especially impactful in London, with an IDA tasked with tackling all GLA-owned brownfield land, Opportunity sites and Intensification Areas.

It seems the government may not understand
that planning is utterly at the behest of local politics

 

The idea isn’t new, or even particularly radical, given we’ve done it before with the Olympic Development Authority (ODA) which transformed swathes of brownfield land and achieved what was thought at its inception to be unachievable. The ODA presided over clearing the site for the Olympics and creating new infrastructure ahead of the Games, and post 2012, with building almost 3,000 homes and creating a lasting legacy. If there was no ODA, it’s almost inevitable this process would have been extremely drawn out, even nigh on impossible.

These IDAs or independent bodies need not be insensitive to, or go against the grain of local planning concerns – but instead comprise a mix of disciplines which can work well with local communities and planning departments, without needing to be elected by constituents.

The air of remove and independence should allow a crystal clear focus on meeting housing targets, ensuring design rigour, long-term value, and making best use of available land. IDAs could add extra firepower to local planning departments, particularly in London.

The opportunity is thus; there is enough brownfield land in the UK, and enough GLA brownfield land to house even London’s predicted 2050 population but we must have an effective model of planning to be able to use it properly. If we are asking developers and housebuilders to sign up to saddle the costs of five years in planning (and if planning departments remain overstretched and underfunded), then where does that leave the targets?

Earle Arney is founder and chief executive at Arney Fender Katsalidis